Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 101 - 110 of 165,938
Whyte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02099
Plaintiff: Joan Whyte
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff: Nakisha Allen
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ranney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff: Jerry Ranney
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff: Alven Blake
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bishop v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff: Joseph Bishop
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Villumsen v. Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff: Jens Verner Villumsen
Defendant: Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hatmaker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00258
Interested Party: SSA
Plaintiff: Kyle Hatmaker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00138
Interested Party: SSA
Plaintiff: Darryl Thomas
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?