Cases 101 - 110 of 13,001
Winegarner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jean Winegarner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dunn v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Alan Dunn
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hiner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Hiner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Foertsch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cindy Foertsch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Linton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Linton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kandie Ann Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rundblad v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Janine R. Rundblad
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O`Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Black v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Beverly Black and Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Goodell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
