Cases 101 - 110 of 206
Blow v. Virginia College
as 5:2012cv03657
Plaintiff:
Donnetta M. Blow
Defendant:
Virginia College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Markham v. Books-A-Million Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03526
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Markham
Defendant:
Books-A-Million Inc , Clyde B Anderson and Terrance G Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burgess v. Material Delivery Service Inc
as 2:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Wreath Sherman Burgess
Defendant:
Material Delivery Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hill v. Jim Burke Automotive et al
as 2:2012cv02381
Plaintiff:
Jack Hill
Defendant:
Jim Burke Automotive and John Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hicks v. Berney Office Solutions, LLC
as 2:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Cassie Hicks
Defendant:
Berney Office Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Walker v. ITT Educational Services Inc
as 2:2012cv01819
Plaintiff:
Bellinda Walker
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Scott v. Walker County Board of Education et al
as 6:2012cv01808
Plaintiff:
Rita Scott
Defendant:
Walker County Board of Education, Alan Trotter, Vonda Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Henderson v. Roanoke Healthcare Center, LLC
as 3:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Nicole Henderson
Defendant:
Roanoke Healthcare Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
as 2:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Branch v. Wendy's Arby's Group (WAG)
as 2:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Amy Branch
Defendant:
Jeff Collins and Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc
Counter_claimant:
Jeff Collins and Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc
Counter_defendant:
Amy Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
