Cases 101 - 110 of 12,985
Foertsch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cindy Foertsch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Goodell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heard v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Heard
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bereckis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kim Bereckis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Damon Colter Robertson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jessica Diane Perkins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moffett v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Casey D. Moffett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bourgeois v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Fred Bourgeois
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sharee R. Hills
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Theiss v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Myra J Theiss
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
