Cases 111 - 120 of 491
Dengos v. DST Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12602
Defendant:
J. Marc Palmer and DST Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dengos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron v. US Med Acquisition, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10300
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Barron
Defendant:
US Med Acquisition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Abrar et al v. Republic Parking System, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11183
Plaintiff:
Shiferaw Awlachew, Mohamed Abrar and Hussein Hussein
Defendant:
Scott Titmus and Republic Parking System, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Munoz v. Au Pair Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10184
Plaintiff:
Silvia Juliana Forero Munoz
Defendant:
Intrax Inc. dba AuPairCare, Marcie Schneider, Au Pair Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mitchell et al v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
as 1:2020cv10110
Plaintiff:
Nada Yousif and Dywuan Mitchell
Defendant:
Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cervantes v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10106
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Awlachew v. Republic Parking System, LLC
as 1:2019cv12446
Plaintiff:
Shiferaw Awlachew
Defendant:
Republic Parking System, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy et al v. Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc
as 1:2019cv12487
Plaintiff:
Mark Kennedy, Joseph Wright, Richard Pierce, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scalia v. UHS of Fuller, Inc./UHS of Delaware, Inc.
as 1:2019cv12490
Respondent:
UHS of Fuller, Inc./UHS of Delaware, Inc.
Petitioner:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Desy v AZZ, Inc.
as 4:2019cv40135
Plaintiff:
AZZ, Inc. and Pro Se Party Louis J. Desy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
