Cases 111 - 120 of 3,141
Russell v. Steak N Shake, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Carolina Russell
Defendant:
Steak N Shake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Conerly v. Clymer Farner Barley Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Lester Conerly
Defendant:
Clymer Farner Barley Inc. and Clymer Farner Barley Surveying, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Evans v. ChildNet, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23725
Plaintiff:
Vaneatra Evans
Defendant:
ChildNet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
THOMAS v. PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC
as 4:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
EBONY THOMAS
Defendant:
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC doing business as WESTMINSTER OAKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Cook-Cowart v. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tonya Cook-Cowart
Defendant:
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. doing business as Sally Beauty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Marzban v. Larkin Community Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23711
Plaintiff:
Sima Marzban
Defendant:
Larkin Community Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2615 Medical Recovery Act
Fredrick v. GEICO
as 8:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
HEIDI B FREDRICK and Heidi B. Fredrick
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
DICKEY v. TRULIEVE INC
as 4:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
NATCHEZ DICKEY
Defendant:
TRULIEVE INC doing business as TRULIEVE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Adewale Adebayo v. Wellstar Medical Group, LLC
as 23-13209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADEWALE ADEBAYO
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLSTAR MEDICAL GROUP, LLC
TURNER v. BLUETRITON BRANDS INC
as 4:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
ALEX TURNER
Defendant:
BLUETRITON BRANDS, INC. and BLUETRITON BRANDS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
