Cases 111 - 120 of 30,341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Maxor National Pharmacy Services, LLC v. PHARMAFORCE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01379
Plaintiff:
Maxor National Pharmacy Services, LLC
Defendant:
PHARMAFORCE GROUP, LLC, Daniel Dimitri and Anthony Velasquez
WHITLOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E WHITLOCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Christine Wormuth, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. BELL, JR.
as 2:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Respondent:
BILL BELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY v. STARR
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY
Defendant:
CURT STARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wright v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
