Cases 111 - 120 of 44,610
Thomas v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Julian Thomas
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Chris Watkins, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Clark
as 1:2024cv01161
Petitioner:
Jimmy Tilley, Jr
Respondent:
Tiffany Clark
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Blake D Wilson
Defendant:
Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Stark et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
. Stark, Kristie Hart, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubini v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01943
Petitioner:
Jacob A Rubini
Respondent:
Warden Brittany Greene and Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles v. Bennette et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Charles
Defendant:
Karen Bennette, Billy T Barbosa, David Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Koontz v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
IDOC, Chad Huber, Steven Kotteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
