Cases 121 - 130 of 3,851
Moreta v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Petitioner:
Jose Moreta
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meades v. May
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Meades
Defendant:
Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Doyle et al
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Parker
Defendant:
Mary Dayle, Officer Malloy, Officer Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Harmon
as 1:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Evans
Defendant:
Nekeya Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Byron White
Respondent:
State of Delaware, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Warden Scott Ceresini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
