Cases 131 - 140 of 154
Adams Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Wesfield Construction Co., Inc., et al
as 3:2009cv30040
Plaintiff:
Adams Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesfield Construction Co., Inc. and Acadia Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States for the Use and Benefit of Yankee Technology, Inc. et al v. Pinnacle Piping and Service Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv10371
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Yankee Technology, Inc. and Yankee Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Pinnacle Piping and Service Corporation and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carl Thomas Construction Corporation v. RDA Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv11644
Plaintiff:
Carl Thomas Construction Corporation
Defendant:
RDA Construction Corp. and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America et al v. Veterans Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10348
Plaintiff:
United States of America and A. Ciano, Inc.
Defendant:
Veterans Construction, LLC and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America et al v. P & S Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv12368
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 4:2006cv40141
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Dahar v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 1:2006cv10026
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America v. ODF Contracting Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv12523
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
United States of America v. Roads Corporation et al
as 1:2005cv12198
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, et al
as 1:2005cv12190
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
