Cases 131 - 140 of 5,557
Jackson v. Fonbuena Law Firm, PLLC
as 4:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Fonbuena Law Firm, PLLC doing business as Accident Attorneys of America
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fieni et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Fieni and Revive Medspa & Integrative Medicine
Defendant:
Emily Freeman and Simply Blessed Healthcare & Medspa PLLC
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. Baker et al
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hunter S. Baker and Hunter S.Baker d/b/a Baker and Sons Tree Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Siegfried v. Roman Health Ventures Inc
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Gavin Siegfried
Defendant:
Roman Health Ventures Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
M. Danner v. The Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2020cv00675
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Everlast Roofing, Inc. v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Everlast Roofing, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Wilson and Peak Quality Products LLC
The Ritescreen Company, LLC v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
The Ritescreen Company, LLC
Defendant:
Michael J. White and Flexscreen, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
