Cases 131 - 140 of 33,802
Patent Armory Inc. v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GENGHISCOMM HOLDINGS, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
GENGHISCOMM HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Malikie Innovations Limited v. D-Link Corporation
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Malikie Innovations Limited
Defendant:
D-Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Topa Spirits, LLC v. Mezcal De Amor, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
as 4:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Topa Spirits, LLC
Defendant:
Mezcal De Amor, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
LINFO IP, LLC, v. PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNA, LLC.,
as 7:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
LINFO IP, LLC,
Defendant:
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNA, LLC.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Linfo IP, LLC v. 5.11, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
5.11, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. unum group
as 6:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
unum group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Luxottica of America, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Luxottica of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
