Cases 131 - 140 of 165,938
Marris v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Sheila Marris
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Integrated Surgical Solutions, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Integrated Surgical Solutions, Inc. and Wilson Beers
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Franklin, II v. Medina Township Police et al.
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Franklin, II, Vince and Vinny
Defendant:
Medina Township Police and Officer E. Chaperlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Isabel Gonzalez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamner-Baines v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Janice Hamner-Baines
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jansen v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Joan Jansen
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leach v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Katherine Leach
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson-Simmons v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
Pamela Anderson-Simmons
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beegle v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02104
Plaintiff:
Brandy Beegle
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jensen v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Keith Jensen
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
