Cases 141 - 150 of 387
United States v. Dudley et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Defendant:
Robert W. Dudley, Joanne I. Dudley, Cape Girardeau County and others
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v Moore, et al
as 2:2012cv04196
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bruce E Moore, Lisa A Moore, Diamond M Building Contractors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Nichols v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv03338
Plaintiff:
Ted Nichols
Defendant:
United States of America , LaKeS, LLC , Kyle Jon Thompson and others
Counter_claimant:
LaKeS, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Kyle Jon Thompson, Ted Nichols , United States of America and others
Cross_claimant:
LaKeS, LLC
Cross_defendant:
Kyle Jon Thompson, Ted Nichols , United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States v. Hall
as 4:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Mark Steven Hall
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7407
United States of America v. Steele et al
as 4:2012cv01055
Defendant:
Daniel K. Steele, Judy D. Steele, US Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
v. Steele et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Defendant:
Daniel K. Steele, Judy D. Steele, US Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Knight-Ritchie et al
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rita D. Knight-Ritchie, Carl D. Ritchie and Missouri Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Watson
as 4:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rahman Watson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Guier et al
as 4:2012mc09005
Defendant:
Roy W. Guier and Judy K. Guier
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
