Cases 141 - 150 of 191
Whitfield v. AAA Carolinas
as 2:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Michele Whitfield
Defendant:
AAA Carolinas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hicks v. Alcoa Inc et al
as 2:2009cv03296
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Hicks
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc, Alcoa of South Carolina Inc and Alumax of South Carolina Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Klump v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated et al
as 6:2009cv03214
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Klump
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Minter v. Certainteed Corporation
as 2:2009cv02520
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Minter, II
Defendant:
Certainteed Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jefferson v. Edw C Levy Co et al
as 2:2009cv01215
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Jefferson
Defendant:
Edw C Levy Co and Butler Mill Service Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hutchins v. United States Department of Labor
as 8:2009cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gwyniece Hutchins
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Allen v. Kennametal Inc
as 8:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
James Edward Allen
Defendant:
Kennametal Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC
as 8:2008cv03857
Plaintiff:
Sonny Adams
Defendant:
Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sandersfeld et al v. Boozer Lumber Company et al
as 3:2008cv02934
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sandersfeld, Jerry Sandersfeld, Charles Belcher and others
Defendant:
Boozer Lumber Company and Boozer Lumber LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huntsinger v. Bergen Enterprises et al
as 7:2008cv02798
Plaintiff:
Ronald Huntsinger
Defendant:
Bergen Enterprises and Martin Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
