Cases 151 - 160 of 4,260
Bonk v. Sacramento Media, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bonk
Defendant:
Sacramento Media, LLC and Stefan Wanczyk
Oxley v. Kaiser Permanente et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Bethany Oxley
Defendant:
Kaiser Permanente, Kaiser Hospital, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Aguilar v. The Neil Jones Food Company
as 1:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Andrade Aguilar
Defendant:
The Neil Jones Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mitchell et al v. San Antonio Creek LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02467
Plaintiff:
Leah Mitchell, Jennica Trezona and Elizabeth Castillo
Defendant:
San Antonio Creek LLC and Daniel Tulipani
Todd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Local Union 343 v. G.A.R. Plumbing Partners, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02282
Petitioner:
Local Union 343 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent:
G.A.R. Plumbing Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Heise v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Todd Heise
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Glenn v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Glenna Glenn
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Budd v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Brian Budd
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
