Torts - Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 766
Daley v. The Schepens Eye Research Institute
as 24-1130
Plaintiff: NANCY DALEY
Defendant: MIRA, INC., SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, f/k/a Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation and THE SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, f/k/a Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation
Fruzzetti v. Town Counsel Chair, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff: LEE FRUZZETTI
Defendant: TOWN COUNSEL CHAIR, Town of Plymouth, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANIEL PERRY, Easton Police Detective and others
Bourgeois v. The TJX Companies, Inc.
as 24-1086
Plaintiff: JODI BOURGEOIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-1234
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: SEAN "P. DIDDY" COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Jones v. RI State Police, et al
as 24-1246
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: RHODE ISLAND STATE POLICE and HOPKINTON POLICE
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-1231
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: SEAN "P. DIDDY" COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Raheb v. Delaware North Companies, Inc. - Boston, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER RAHEB
Defendant: DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, INC. - BOSTON, d/b/a TD Garden and UG2, LLC
Jennings v. Dr. Young, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff: EDWARD VINCENT JENNINGS, JR.
Simmon-Roman, et al v. Cruz-Burgos
as 24-1094
Plaintiff: RICHARD SIMMON-ROMAN and SIGFREDO SANTANA
Defendant: ROSA ILEANA CRUZ-BURGOS and GYNECOLOGY REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY AND FERTILITY INSTITUTE
Castillo, et al v. Guardian Insurance Company, Inc., et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff: YELITZA CASTILLO, LESLIE SANCHEZ and SYLVIA NEGRON
Defendant: GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., JAMES UGOBONO DIAZ and FRANCISCO RIVERA MORALES
Interested Party: JEANIE CARRION-CARRERO and JUDGE CHARLES A. CORDERO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?