Cases 11 - 20 of 123
ESPOSITO v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
DARLENE EPISITO and DARLENE ESPOSITO
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC and PINTO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Tanner v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Tabetha A. Tanner
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 2:2022cv02741
Plaintiff:
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
as 2:2021cv04217
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGATION SERVICES
as 2:2021cv04529
Plaintiff:
CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 5:2021cv04283
Plaintiff:
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hoffmann v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2020cv06427
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hoffmann
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
as 2:2020cv03764
Plaintiff:
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
as 2:2020cv03646
Plaintiff:
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL
Defendant:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
