Cases 11 - 20 of 11,723
WELSH v. PATEL et al
as 5:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
MELISSA WELSH
Defendant:
HETAL PATEL and JUHI K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CREWS v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
KYLE CREWS
Defendant:
AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Garrett v. Otu et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Rockie S. Otu and Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Garrett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Baucom et al v. Torres Vidal
as 2:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Shelley L Baucom and Joseph Baucom
Defendant:
Samira M Torres Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HARMON v. ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
as 2:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
AARON HARMON
Defendant:
ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BRATCHER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv01811
Plaintiff:
AJAMU BRATCHER
Defendant:
JEFFREY SMITH and D & F TRAVEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CAMPEA v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA CAMPEA
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MORGAN v. GU YEA
as 2:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MORGAN
Defendant:
SUNG GU YEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ISLAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv05731
Plaintiff:
ZAHIRUL ISLAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-5 (fictitious business entities) and JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious individuals)
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
BELTON et al v. LIEBLANG et al
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
KYLA BELTON and ZAKIYA MCDUFFIE
Defendant:
MATTHEW LIEBLANG, FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. and JOHN DOE DESIGNATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
