General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,696
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff: AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff: MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff: JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff: JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Gustavo Velez-Hernandez v. District Attorney Lehigh County, et al
as 24-1642
Plaintiff: GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Clyde Jones v. Warden Canaan USP
as 24-1651
Plaintiff: CLYDE JONES
Defendant: WARDEN CANAAN USP
USA v. Alexander Ros Lazo
as 24-1662
Petitioner: ALEXANDER ROS LAZO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff: DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant: MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff: WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Dwight Hill v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1636
Plaintiff: DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?