Cases 11 - 20 of 17,786
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hearn v. USA
as 1:2024cv00863
Petitioner:
Ronnie Hearn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethune v. USA
as 1:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
Brandon Bethune
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Malvasi v. Warden David W. Gray
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2024cv02303
Petitioner:
DAVON L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, RYAN A. PFEFFERIE and KAITLYN C. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Titus v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
