Cases 11 - 20 of 107,675
Lobato Quito v. Garland
as 24-1297
Petitioner:
MILTON WLADIMIR LOBATO QUITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ayavaca et al
as 3:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Elvis Gustavo Ayavaca and Latin Escape Bar & Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized reception of signal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kahan v. Stein
as 7:2024cv03688
Plaintiff:
Avraham Kahan
Defendant:
Raphael Stein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) False representation of goods sold in interstate commerce
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Liu
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
HUZHOU HUIRONGSHENG EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, HUZHOU HUIHENGYING EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP and HUZHOU CHUANGTAI RONGYUAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
DUO LIU, ST. TOME LLC., ST. FORTUNE GROUP LLC. and others
Ahmed v. Garland
as 24-1284
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD SHAMIM AHMED, RUJY BEGUM and SAMIRA BEGUM
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ham-Pena v. Garland
as 24-1287
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO HAM-PENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rana v. Garland
as 24-1286
Petitioner:
BODRUZZAMAN RANA, TAHIRA ZAMAN INAISHA, AYSHA ZAMAN AVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
