Cases 11 - 20 of 2,219
Xidrone Systems v. Fortem Technologies
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Xidrone Systems
Defendant:
Fortem Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
JENCO, LC et al v. Valderra Development, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
JENCO, LC and Dean Gardner Investment, LC
Defendant:
Valderra Development, LLC, Valderra Land Holdings, LLC, The Ledges of St. George Master Owners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bucks & Bulls v. AZ Buck and Bulls
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Bucks & Bulls
Defendant:
AZ Buck and Bulls
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al v. Aylo Freesites Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C.
Defendant:
Aylo Freesites Ltd and 9219-1568 Quebec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals et al v. Vintage Muscle
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Wellness
Defendant:
Vintage Muscle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Boxabl Inc v. Box House Inc
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Boxabl Inc
Defendant:
Box House Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Boxabl Inc v. Box House Inc
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Boxabl Inc
Defendant:
Box House Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CAO Group Inc v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
CAO Group Inc
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Viral DRM v. RakAdx
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM
Defendant:
Rakadx
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
EK Ekcessories v. National Industries for the Blind
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
EK Ekcessories
Defendant:
National Industries for the Blind
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
