Cases 21 - 30 of 17,671
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon (PS) v. U.S Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Petitioner:
Larry Gordon
Respondent:
U.S Parole Commission and Eric Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Dillon v. Payne
as 24-3065
Petitioner:
SEAN J. DILLON
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Wilson v. Payne
as 24-3064
Petitioner:
AARON W. WILSON
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Campbell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Edward H. Campbell
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Archuleta v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole Director et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Records Manager, Margaret M White and others
Petitioner:
Pete Archuleta, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
