General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,696
Frank Tepper v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1271
Plaintiff: FRANK TEPPER
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Carl Holdren v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1617
Plaintiff: CARL J. HOLDREN
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Elwood Small v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1592
Plaintiff: ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Amin Rashid v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 24-1260
Plaintiff: AMIN A. RASHID
Defendant: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Gerald Bush v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1616
Plaintiff: GERALD BUSH
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas Dewald v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1580
Petitioner: THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Christopher West v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1611
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant: WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Christopher Nguyen v. District Attorney Berks County, et al
as 24-1582
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant: WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Ji'Haad Harrison v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-1587
Plaintiff: JI'HAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MERCER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?