Cases 21 - 30 of 10,134
Goering-Runyan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caballero-Leon v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Abelardo Caballero-Leon
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sarabia v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Mario Santana Sarabia
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Paul Dawson
Defendant:
Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delfin v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Jorge Delfin
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glassman v. Braun et al
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Glassman
Defendant:
Mark Braun, Bobbie France, Tina Lovik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Francisco Macias, Menphrey McGhee, John Benge and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Tina Kotek, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofodrinwa v. Kizzar et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Justus Ofodrinwa
Defendant:
Jonathan Kizzar, Lino Pavon and Bryan Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henke v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Greg Allen Henke
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
