Cases 21 - 30 of 3,063
(PS) Jutla v. Redfin Corporation
as 2:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Rajninder Jutla
Defendant:
Redfin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Loewen v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Erik D. Loewen
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Miller et al
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Angela Boykin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Netgear, Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Netgear, Inc.
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
American Medical Response of Inland Empire et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
American Medical Response of Inland Empire
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors, INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Chiuchiarelli et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01895
Plaintiff:
Jennifer B. Chiuchiarelli, April H. Yamaichi, Kiyomi Ishii and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 2:2024at00376
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Dwyer et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Richard Dwyer and Aimen Halim
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
