Cases 21 - 30 of 18,911
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODWARD v. MATLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv05468
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. WOODWARD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MATLOCK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY v. PARROTT
as 2:2024cv05460
Plaintiff:
H. TORY POSEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. PARROTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP et al
as 2:2024cv05502
Plaintiff:
JOSE TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, PHV JUSTIN M. SHER, PHV MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner:
JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOWARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05434
Petitioner:
RICHARD HOWARD
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
