Cases 21 - 30 of 6,338
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Jail
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00433
Petitioner:
Nicholas J Leach
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hunter v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Walter D Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
