Cases 31 - 40 of 10,307
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
KWAM'E LAKIM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNA GREY, DALLAS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PROVOST et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
WENCESLAUS PROVOST, JR and ANGELA PROVOST
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
ROSEMOND v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
GARRY ROSEMOND
Defendant:
PAMELA B. WASHINGTON and KIMBERLY SMITH
SMITH v. UNITED STATES TREASURY et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TREASURY, BANK OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
