Cases 31 - 40 of 2,497
Stripling v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Stripling
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell and Smiley Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeley v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Christopher Leo Weeley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Clarke doing business as Gtwo and Clarke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Nelson
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin LaMont Buck Meeks
Defendant:
LaQuesha LaShay Annette Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Christy Cantrell
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Moore
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Public Defenders Office, et al.
as 4:2023cv00561
Defendant:
Jermaine T S Washington, Public Defenders Office, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine TS Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
