Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Maine
Cases 31 - 40 of 85
LEHTINEN v. CORBIN
as 2:2005cv00050
USA v. $58,300 IN US CURRENCY et al
as 2:2013cv00346
Defendant: $10,900 IN MONEY ORDERS, $58,300 IN US CURRENCY
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. $18,900 US CURRENCY
as 2:2014cv00277
Claimant: LUIS ORTEGA
Defendant: $18,900 US CURRENCY
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. ONE BONTEBOK TROPHY
as 2:2006cv00172
Cause Of Action: Endangered Species Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEVEN ASSORTED FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
as 1:2007cv00049
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SEVEN ASSORTED FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. JOHNSON
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 SWAN LAKE AVENUE, MONROE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00488
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 SWAN LAKE AVENUE, MONROE
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $25,011.18 IN FUNDS FROM BANK ACCT NO 8900333150 AT SACO AND BIDDEFORD SAVINGS INSTITUTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $25,011.18 IN FUNDS FROM BANK ACCT NO 8900333150 AT SACO AND BIDDEFORD SAVINGS INSTITUTION, $10,246.72 IN FUNDS FROM BANK ACCT NO 6010219597 AT GORHAM SAVINGS BANK, $5,794.16 IN FUNDS FROM BANK ACCT NO 191360054867 AT KEYBANK and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSEPH R RICHARD
Cause Of Action: Occupational Safety/Health
USA v. ONE MAVERICK ARMS 12 GAUGE SHOTGUN, et al.
as 2:2006cv00038
Cause Of Action: Petition for Return of Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?