Cases 31 - 40 of 4,311
Nussbaum v. Porch.com, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Paul Nussbaum
Defendant:
Porch.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lane v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Lane
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Kirk v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gary Kirk
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Warren et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Karon Warren, Deborah Kaplan, Kimberly Kavin and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie Su, Administrator Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nikolich et al v. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael Nikolich and Aaron Sponaugle
Defendant:
Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. doing business as Southern Protection Agency
Roberts v. Accentcare, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01040
Defendant:
Accentcare, Inc. and Guardian Home Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
Carla Roberts
Johnson v. No Limit Investigative and Security Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
No Limit Investigative and Security Services, LLC and Robert Ford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Brown v. Routes Car Rental USA Inc.
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Bayo K. Brown
Defendant:
Routes Car Rental USA Inc.
Dickerson v. Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dickerson
Defendant:
Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. and Priscilla B. Faulkner
Muhammad v. Environmental Food Group Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin Muhammad
Defendant:
Environmental Food Group Inc., EFG Inc. doing business as Terra Terroir, Timothy T. Moore and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
