Cases 31 - 40 of 597
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.13AcresOfLand,OwnedByLewisOClements,Sr,AnthonyGray,KathyPoindexter,LeanCRobertson,NadineBPerkins,AnthonyBrown,HenryIsaiahNewbillMarvinNewbill,LaverneNDavis,AliceNDavis,ThomasDouglasClements,Jr,
as 7:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.13AcresOfLand,OwnedByLewisOClements,Sr,AnthonyGray,KathyPoindexter,LeanCRobertson,NadineBPerkins,AnthonyBrown,HenryIsaiahNewbillMarvinNewbill,LaverneNDavis,AliceNDavis,ThomasDouglasClements,Jr,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.51 Acres of Land, Owned by Kendall Lumber Company, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
2.51 Acres of Land, Owned by Kendall Lumber Company, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.14 Acres of Land, Owned by Mark E. Daniel and Angela D. Daniel
as 7:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
4.14 Acres of Land, Owned by Mark E. Daniel and Angela D. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements
as 7:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Ann C. Clements and Mary Arrington Clements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. 0.01 Acres of Land, Owned by Cora Lee Smith, Ruby J. Smith, Gene E. Smith, Gena D. Reed, Bethany A. Smith, and John Erik Smith
as 7:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant:
0.01 Acres of Land, Owned by Cora Lee Smith, Ruby J. Smith, Gene E. Smith, Gena D. Reed, Bethany A. Smith, and John Erik Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.88 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.88 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 1.42 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones et al
as 7:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.335 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones and 2.01 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.48 Acres of Land, Owned by David H. Crane and Joyce J. Crane, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.48 Acres of Land, Owned by David H. Crane and Joyce J. Crane, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
