Cases 41 - 50 of 10,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Darla v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10786
Plaintiff:
Norah P Darla
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jeannite v. Pasciak et al
as 1:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Tyler Christian Pasciak and Margrette Albertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jeannite v. Hickey et al
as 1:2024cv10796
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Matthew Hickey and Col. John Mawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2024cv10223
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Paramasivam v. Blinkin et al
as 1:2024cv10757
Plaintiff:
Sivakumar Paramasivam
Defendant:
Secretary of State Antony Blinkin, Secretary of USDHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Melendez et al
as 1:2024cv10698
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Christopher Melendez, Brian Gravel, Anthony Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
