Cases 41 - 50 of 78
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROTHBERG-MARGER
as 2:2012cv02401
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
SARANNE ROTHBERG-MARGER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv02191
Petitioner:
JAY S. PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and LINDA HAWS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
as 2:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
F.S.C.C. INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv01140
Petitioner:
F.S.C.C. INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
EAST OF EDEN, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv01141
Petitioner:
EAST OF EDEN, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
NOVAK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv01139
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH NOVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PALLADINO et al
as 1:2012cv00710
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
MICHAEL PALLADINO and LISA PALLADINO
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
SONG v. THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 2:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SONG and THU L
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES , INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER , STEPHEN J. MCCARRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CATLETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07932
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
IRVIN HANNIS CATLETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOVAK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv07632
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH NOVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
