Cases 41 - 50 of 809
Laboratory Charter School v. M. S., et al
as 23-2642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LABORATORY CHARTER SCHOOL
Defendant / Appellant:
M. R. S., by and through her parent S.S., S. S., individually, M. R. S., by and through her parent Sharona Smith and others
Laboratory Charter School v. M. S., et al
as 23-2473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LABORATORY CHARTER SCHOOL
Defendant / Appellee:
M. R. S., 'by and through her parent SS, and her parent individually, S. S., M. R. S., 'by and through her parent Sharona Smith, and her parent individually and others
CareDx Inc v. Natera Inc
as 23-2427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREDX INC
Defendant / Appellee:
NATERA INC
CareDx Inc v. Natera Inc
as 23-2428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAREDX INC
Defendant / Appellant:
NATERA INC
Bobrick Washroom Equipment Inc v. Scranton Products Inc
as 23-2577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT INC
Defendant / Appellee:
SCRANTON PRODUCTS INC
Ryan Givey v. DOJ, et al
as 23-2330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN P. GIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JENNIFER A. WILLIAMS
Jose Morales Godinez v. Levi Morales Godinez
as 23-2194
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE LUIS MORALES GODINEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
LEVI HELEM MORALES GODINEZ
In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer
as 23-2377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE M. BERMUDEZ, NICHOLAS TODD HEINRICH and LYNNE KRAUSE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Plaintiff:
DMITRII MUDRECHENKO
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC, MEDIA INNOVATION GROUP LLC, WPP PLC and others
Bank of New York Mellon v. Mark Mazza, et al
as 23-2168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWALT, Inc. , Alternative Loan Trust 2006-0A10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-0A10
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK MAZZA and LISA MAZZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
