Cases 41 - 50 of 107,442
E. F. v. Mayor Eric Adams
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
E. F., On Behalf of Himself and On Behalf of His Minor Child, O.F., J. R., On Behalf of Herself and On Behalf of Her Minor Child, K.R., J. F., On Behalf of Himself and On Behalf of His Minor Child, H.F. and others
Defendant:
Mayor ERIC ADAMS, In His Official Capacity, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Lee v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1159
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, JAMAL PESARAN and others
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Merson v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1161
Plaintiff:
ZHANG ZHENMING, KAI CHEN and MICHAEL MERSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Roosevelt Road Re, Ltd. et al v. Hajjar et al
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Road Re, Ltd. and Tradesman Program Managers, LLC
Defendant:
John H. Hajjar, Surgicare, LLC, Surgicare of Manhattan, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Discolo v. United Security, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Francis Discolo
Defendant:
United Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vickers v. Energy Health & Fitness, Corp.
as 1:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Lachae Vickers
Defendant:
Energy Health & Fitness, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jon Tate Construction, LLC et al v. Sika Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jon Tate Construction, LLC and Jon S. Garrett d/b/a Black River Masonry, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Sika Corporation, Sika AG, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Park Construction Company v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03224
Plaintiff:
Park Construction Company
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund for Home Care Workers and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
