Cases 41 - 50 of 18,911
DAVIS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
as 1:2024cv05232
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RECANATI v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv05131
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY RECANATI
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL ALBANESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIZK v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv05575
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SIRIANI v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SIRIANI
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIRE, U.C.H.C. UNIVERSITY CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BUENO v. R. THOMPSON (FCI FORT DIX)
as 1:2024cv00912
Petitioner:
ALEX IZQUIERDO BUENO
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON (FCI FORT DIX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWONTEK v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
BRIAN SWONTEK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
