Cases 41 - 50 of 491
HERNANDEZ v. DFA DAIRY BRANDS ICE CREAM, LLC
as 3:2023cv10139
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DFA DAIRY BRANDS ICE CREAM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cajigas v. Dejoy et al
as 1:2023cv10307
Plaintiff:
Angel J. Cajigas
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, United States Postal Services, Stephen Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Harvard Maintenance, Inc.
as 1:2022cv12199
Plaintiff:
Christian Baez
Defendant:
Harvard Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HERNANDEZ v. DFA DAIRY BRANDS ICE CREAM, LLC
as 1:2023cv10139
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DFA DAIRY BRANDS ICE CREAM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lynch v. Enlighten Software Inc.
as 1:2022cv11997
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Lynch
Defendant:
Enlighten Software Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Flaherty v. Park Plus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11909
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Flaherty
Defendant:
Park Plus, Inc., Ron Astrup and Paul Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Maytas v. Cabinets To Go, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv11545
Plaintiff:
Margaret Maytas
Defendant:
Cabinets To Go, LLC, Thomas Sullivan and Christopher Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ryder v. Vibra Hospital of Western Massachusetts, LLC
as 4:2022cv11273
Plaintiff:
Adam Ryder
Defendant:
Vibra Hospital of Western Massachusetts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2021 Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Taylor v. UKG, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11168
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Taylor
Defendant:
UKG, Inc. and Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Plymouth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
