Cases 51 - 60 of 14,235
US v. Pierluisi-Isern
as 24-1321
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WALTER PIERLUISI-ISERN
Interested Party:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1317
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Interested Party:
PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant:
CHARLES SIDMAN
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff:
PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant:
CHARLES SIDMAN
Phimmady v. Garland
as 24-1330
Petitioner:
SINE PHIMMADY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ruiz-Romero v. Santiago-Colon
as 24-1333
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
PABLO SANTIAGO-COLON
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association, et al
as 24-1115
Plaintiff:
ALLAN M. LEAVITT, Individually, and as Class Representative and JOHN DOE 1-100
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a Texas Department of Insurance Regulated Reciprocal Inter-insurance Exchange and Subsidiary, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY
US v. Yu
as 24-1325
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
HAOYANG YU, a/k/a Jack Yu, a/k/a Harry Yu, a/k/a Jack Tricon
Interested Party:
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1319
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
