Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Sara Baldwin v. Camden Housing Authority
as 11-1451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMDEN HOUSING AUTHORITY
Jeanne McKivitz, et al v. Township of Stowe, et al
as 11-1211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEANNE MCKIVITZ and ROBERT MCKIVITZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF STOWE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and WILLIAM J. SAVATT
In re: Mt Holly Gardens Citizens, et al v. Twp Mount Holly, et al
as 11-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOUNT HOLLY GARDENS CITIZENS IN ACTION INC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PEDRO AROCHO, CHRISTINE BARNES, BERNICE CAGLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TWP MOUNT HOLLY, TWP CNCL OF MOUNT HOLLY, KEATING URBAN PARTNERS and others
Melvin Marin v. Joseph Fragel, et al
as 10-4797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH FRAGEL, Individually, MIKE DONATO, VICTOR S. HEUTSCHE and others
Melvin Marin v. Joseph Fragel, et al
as 10-4059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH FRAGEL, Individually, MIKE DONATO, VICTOR S. HEUTSCHE and others
Kenneth Snyder, et al v. Tawoos Bazargani, et al
as 10-3765
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH SNYDER and JACQUELINE SNYDER
Defendant - Appellant:
TAWOOS BAZARGANI
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL BAGHERPOUR
Dorothy Watson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
as 10-3158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Disabled Action PA v. SEPTA
as 09-3964
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DISABLED ACTION PA
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA")
Curtis Paschal v. Billy Beru, Inc
as 09-2764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HYRAM PASCHAL
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY BERU INC
Steven Thompson v. Eva's Village and Sheltering P
as 09-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EVAS VILLAGE AND SHELTERING PROGRAM, et als, DERRICK WILLIAMS, GREGORY ANDERSON, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
