Cases 51 - 60 of 262
JELLEY et al v. COLTON AUTO, INC.
as 2:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
BRENDA JELLEY and JOSEPH F. SALCE
Defendant:
COLTON AUTO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorn v. Flunory et al
as 3:2017cv01482
Plaintiff:
Jared Dorn
Defendant:
Cornelius Flunory, Guaranteed Express Incorporated, Ryder Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kostro et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 3:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Christy Kostro and Mochael Kostro
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor America Corporation, Hyundai Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marzolf et al v. Beutler et al
as 4:2017cv00920
Plaintiff:
James S. Marzolf and Yolanda M. Canales
Defendant:
Jaide Beutler and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
THORN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2016cv01267
Plaintiff:
THORN and GINA THORN
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dillman v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Marilin E. Dillman
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. PORRECA et al
as 2:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
CARL JACKSON
Defendant:
JAMES PORRECA and TAYLOR OIL CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruddy et al v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ruddy and Rebecca Ruddy
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Polaris Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. ROMANOS AUTO REPAIR
as 5:2017cv00701
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA KING
Defendant:
ROMANOS AUTO REPAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and SAMANTHA MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
