Cases 51 - 60 of 4,336
Boyd v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Coates
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party
Defendant:
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hildebrandt et al v. Lovik et al
as 6:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Cody Dean Hildebrandt, Jefferson Warren Davis and Tylor Setzer
Defendant:
Tina Lovik and Mark Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamper v. Hunter et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Robert James Stamper
Defendant:
Dusti Hunter and Lt. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rev. Patrick Hugh Ronald Morrison
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Heidi Steward, Jammie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Blanton et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hudson
Defendant:
Officer Blanton, Officer Huerta and SHU Lt. Roughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
