Cases 51 - 60 of 120,213
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Application for Naturalization Hearing
Benjamin Gonzalez v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv03147
Petitioner:
Benjamin Gonzalez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamie Cid v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cid
Defendant:
Lieutenant Gillespie, Sergeant Falfal and Santa Barbara County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PC) Webber v. Barrios et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Doyal Webber
Defendant:
J. Barrios, J. Ervin, P. Liamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner:
Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
