Cases 51 - 60 of 4,169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Happy Monk LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Chaoran Tang, Happy Monk LLC doing business as Happy Monk Club and Scott Tang
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma v. City of Wagoner, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma
Defendant:
City of Wagoner, Oklahoma, Wagoner Public Works Authority and Wagoner, City of
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1926 Water and Waste Facility Loans and Grants
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Blind Swine LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Blind Swine LLC doing business as Blind Swine, Bailey Stanphill and Lori Stanphill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caloto v. Paycom Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Chris H. Caloto
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig E. Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
