Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,251
Matthews v. USA
as 1:2023cv02133
Plaintiff: Dontavious Matthews
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poku v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02032
Petitioner: Maurice J. Poku, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02326
Petitioner: Tevin Mitchell
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gude v. USA
as 1:2023cv01875
Plaintiff: Brian-Paul Alexander Gude
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Doherty v. USA
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff: Robert Doherty
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Greenhill v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02173
Petitioner: Elisabeth Greenhill
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carroll v. USA
as 1:2023cv02076
Petitioner: Craig Courtney Carroll
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Craig v. USA
as 1:2023cv02146
Plaintiff: Shauntay Craig
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Avery-Kelly v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02015
Petitioner: Arnita Avery-Kelly, D.P.M
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01475
Petitioner: Marlon R. Miller
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?