Cases 51 - 60 of 1,986
USA v. Clark
as 6:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Michael Clark
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Graham v. ELN Enterprises, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GRAHAM
Defendant:
ELN ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a MIDWEST CES, Jacob Johnsen, DAVID FRANDSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Tucker v. BPS DIRECT, LLC
as 6:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
Arlie Tucker
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC, Cabela's LLC and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Kittles
as 6:2023cv03117
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Vernon Kittles
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Lashin v. T-Mobile US,
as 4:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Waleed Lashin
Defendant:
T-Mobile US,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v Smith, et al.
as 4:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rick Smith and Arrow Plumbing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
USA v. Wingate
as 6:2023cv03109
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Marcus Wingate
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hill et al
as 4:2023mc09004
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Receiver:
Albert C. Black, III
Defendant:
Roy W. Hill, Eric N. Shelly, Clean Energy Technology Association, Inc. and others
USA v. Kaipat
as 6:2023cv03094
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Cling Kaipat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Country Club Bank v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Country Club Bank
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Parade Park Homes, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
