Social Security Cases filed in Washington
Cases 61 - 70 of 14,923
Tompson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05022
Plaintiff: Jamie Tompson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marino v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05036
Plaintiff: Jeramie Marino
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Desanto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03016
Plaintiff: Anthony James Desanto
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hyde v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03018
Plaintiff: April Dawn Hyde
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morfield v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03017
Plaintiff: Stephanie R Morfield
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Czapiewski v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff: Angela J Czapiewski
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McClinton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Teresa A McClinton
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ritchie v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff: Ann Ritchie
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Caty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff: Andrew Charles Caty
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05255
Plaintiff: Peter Cila
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?