Cases 61 - 70 of 10,123
Lachat v. Hendricks
as 6:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Lachat
Respondent:
Kimberly Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipska v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Ally et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dontonio King
Defendant:
Sgt. Ally, Ofc. J. Verity, Ofc. Bourdain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00389
Petitioner:
Jonatan Gutierrez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Amado Pacheco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wasson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
John M. Wasson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ferreira v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Edmond Ferreira
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turnidge v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Turnidge
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, T.R.C.I. RN C. Dieter, Dr. Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Tyler Cox
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
